EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) FOR HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE (a joke)

When President Trump asked the FDA to help Dr. Zelenko,  (TO GIVE ZELENKO ANYTHING HE NEEDED They issued a EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) that wasn't needed for HCQ  (hydroxychloroquine) and the simulation started, the authorization was for hospitalized patients enrolled in trials.  a NFG EUA (comprende?) that in reality did not authorize shit. Hypocrites. 

Why wasn't  the EUA even needed? because hydroxychloroquine can be off-label prescribed, a common and legal practice that allows to re-purpose of approved drugs. The FDA was releasing info drop by drop  

THE ZELENKO PROTOCOL WORKS BY KEEPING THE VIRUS FROM REPLICATING, IF YOUR LUNGS ARE SO INFECTED THAT YOU NEED HOSPITALIZATION THE TREATMENT IS NOT AS EFFECTIVE, IT MAY EVEN  BE TOTALLY USELES AND THE FDA KNOWS THAT OF COURSE. DO THEY FRACKING CARE? NOPE!  (More than one million deaths and I don't see anybody worried).

President Trump, unfortunately, did not have a single loyal, competent Doctor in his team. the two attributes are required. Trump's problem has always been arrogance and pride (if he had one, he didn't listen to him/her. I could tell that neither Fauci nor Birx were loyal to him. 

 They gave Dr. Zelenko a sick man, who lost a lung to cancer and still fighting metastatic cancer a list of phone numbers he could call to get help.  After that, a  whole bunch of dishonest ambitious liars has done nothing but discredit and censure Dr. Zelenko and malign drugs that work

We have had both prophylaxis (prevention) and Therapy (treatment) available since March 21, 2020, and we are like at the beginning. The treatment is effective and inexpensive, no good for business, no good for electoral frauds. 


Frequently Asked Questions on the Revocation of the Emergency Use Authorization for Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate and Chloroquine Phosphate

 

FDA has determined that the statutory criteria for EUA as outlined in Section 564(c)(2) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act are no longer met*. Specifically, FDA has determined that CQ and HCQ are unlikely** to be effective in treating COVID-19 for the authorized uses in the EUA. Additionally, in light of ongoing serious cardiac adverse events  This is a lie, there is no problem at the doses prescribed in the Zelenko Protocol and other serious side effects***, the known and potential benefits of CQ and HCQ no longer outweigh the known and potential risks**** for the authorized use. This conclusion warrants revocation of the EUA for HCQ and CQ for the treatment of COVID-19. Oxford used toxic doses of hydroxychloroquine and they did not find cardiac adverse events even though apparently they were trying to provoke them.


I did it for you, just click the link below
Oxford Pseudo Trial  of Hydroxychloroquine:

 

This is really the truth:

*No longer met implies that the criteria were met at a certain point in time, but nothing changed from the time the EUA was issued and the time when two prestigious magazines had to retract articles related to the subject matter because of fake data. The EUA -by the way- was not needed since HCQ can be prescribed legally using the common practice of “off label prescribing.




 

** Unlikely? Based on what?  Oxford fake trial? HCQ does work if you know how to use it as a Zinc Ionophore (not by itself). They ran a trial designed to fail. Oxford teaches molecular biology, and they know about ionophores, RNA Polymerase and all you need to know to use Zinc ++ to inhibit the virus from replicating. I don’t see any reason why Zinc due to its mechanism of action doesn’t work against variants. Zinc? Yes! It is about zinc, not about hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). 

 

*** These are plain lies HCQ has been used for many years and it is safe. Much more in the low dose of the Zelenko protocol. Besides, there are alternatives to HCQ, such as QCT, EGCG, Hinokitiol, etc.  Is big pharma going to discredit, malign, and satanize all Zinc ionophores? (Last night I learned about a few more). It is over crooks! 






I am disappointed with the Universities of the world that don't do more research and development on cheap, repurposed drugs, I understand that big pharma funds investigations on drugs that mean business to them but what if we legislate that 50% of any donation must be used in projects not tied to the donor's agenda? Are our universities for rent or for sale as the FDA and other regulating agencies?  

 

**** HCQ has been in use for about 60 years for malaria, lupus, arthritis and all of a sudden it becomes so dangerous that even the WHO has an Ad on the internet warning people of its risks? I believe the WHO, NIH, FDA CDC OXFORD etc. are CORRUPT.  


 

For more information : VladimirZelenko.MD.com

 

https://bit.ly/hotsmart


Popular posts from this blog

How To Keep Food Hot On The Plate

CANCER , LAST PIECE OF THE PUZZLE

The FDA on Ivermectin